🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to resume atomic talks with Washington on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations was effective, and shared fresh requests had been made by intermediaries to resume talks with the American leadership. He said Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Path

Araghchi is walking a difficult route since Iran wishes not to be seen to be acting from a stance of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged stronger in military terms and mentally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.

Prior Talks Suddenly Ended

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump claiming the locations had been eliminated. Following this, Western states used their authority to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iranian officials said they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Representatives asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Status

Iranian officials stated the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be revived in certain ways if talks resume.

Trump in recent days said he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Iranian officials say they are not yet receiving clear proposals from Washington either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of non-responsiveness in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran states negotiations is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Stance

In his remarks to the conference, designed to paint the US as a dominant force that exploits the notion of international law, Araghchi declared the two-week conflict demonstrated the clash could not be ended by armed force. He asserted the attacks commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were mounted with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making trust hard to reestablish.

Dialogue Stays the Ultimate Answer

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the western countries that had consistently attempted to impose their desires during the discussions. Dialogue can still be alive and stays the primary resolution to address conflicts, but its requirements, regulations and principles must be adhered to."

"In case they speak to the nation of Iran with the approach of respect and honor, they will obtain a reply in the identical approach."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of repair and reconstruction, Araghchi stated he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We gained multiple understandings from this conflict; we have identified our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He stated: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to destroy, stays intact. The installations and machinery, if eliminated, will be restored; what is essential is the determination of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but were unable to shatter. The nation of Iran have developed more resilient, more cohesive, and more backing of the leadership and the state in the wake of this invasion."